<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/">
<title>Ghost in the Machine</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/</link>
<description>Conjuring Political, Cinematic, Cultural, and Athletic Arcana since 1999</description>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-04T17:14:40-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.23-en" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006261.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006260.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006259.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006258.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006257.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006256.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006255.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006254.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006253.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006252.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006251.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006250.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006249.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006248.html" />

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006247.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006261.html">
<title>Kent Brockman was Right.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006261.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>The colony may be the largest of its type ever known for any insect species, and could rival humans in the scale of its world domination</em>." By way of <a href="http://followmehere.com/">FmH</a>, scientists discover that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8127000/8127519.stm">Argentine ants seems to have developed a multi-continental mega-colony</a>. "<em>[W]henever ants from the main European and Californian super-colonies and those from the largest colony in Japan came into contact, they acted as if they were old friends...In short, they acted as if they all belonged to the same colony, despite living on different continents separated by vast oceans.</em>" Well, one thing is for certain, there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I, for one, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N38z9gYOEIY">welcome our new insect overlords</a>.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Science</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-04T17:14:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006260.html">
<title>It&apos;s So Cold in Alaska.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006260.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>Let me go back to a comfortable analogy for me - sports... basketball. I use it because you're naïve if you don't see the national full-court press picking away right now: A good point guard drives through a full court press, protecting the ball, keeping her eye on the basket...and she knows exactly when to pass the ball so that the team can WIN. And I'm doing that - keeping our eye on the ball that represents sound priorities - smaller government, energy independence, national security, freedom! And I know when it's time to pass the ball - for victory.</em>"<br /><br /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8jGKp4kbeM">Sarah says</a> that she wants to know, why she's given half her life to people she hates now... Or, in other words, members of the press, you won't have a certain maverick <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon%27s_Last_Press_Conference">to kick around anymore</a>...or <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/04/AR2009070401452.html">will you</a>? With a rambling <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/1126706.html">farewell speech</a> that probably <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2222230/">won't be remembered</a> as a model of the form, former veep nominee <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/03/AR2009070301738.html">Sarah Palin resigns the governorship of Alaska</a>. Whether this is due to 2012 calculation or <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/7/3/749722/-Brad-Blog:-Federal-Indictments-for-Palin-in-Embezzlement-Scandal-May-Be-on-the-Way">impending scandal</a> is yet to be determined, although <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/07/first_signs_what_happened.php">the hurriedness of the preparations</a> would seem to suggest the latter.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Sarah Palin</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-04T16:29:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006259.html">
<title>Patience of the Mule.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006259.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em><a href="http://www.kevincmurphy.com/brazil.html">Brazil</a>' is the one that will probably be stamped on my grave because that on seemed to have made a big effect on a lot of people. And that's all I'm trying to do is affect people.</em>" CNN <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/07/03/terry.gilliam.parnassus.ledger/index.html">talks briefly with Terry Gilliam</a> on Heath Ledger's passing, <em>The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus</em>, and sundry other topics. "<em>Talent is less important in filmmaking than patience. If you really want your films to say something that you hope is unique, then patience and stamina, thick skin and a kind of stupidity. A mule-like stupidity is what you really need.</em>"</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Cinema</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-03T20:21:23-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006258.html">
<title>He Knew What He Wanted.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006258.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>'I was so incredibly lucky,' Malden once told The Times. 'I knew I wasn't a leading man. Take a look at this face.</em>'" <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-karl-malden2-2009jul02,0,5658128.story">Karl Malden</a>, nee Mladen Sekulovich, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Malden">1912-2009</a>. "<em>I'm a workaholic. I love every movie I've been in, even the bad ones, every TV series, every play, because I love to work. It's what keeps me going.</em>"</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Cinema</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T15:15:20-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006257.html">
<title>The Royal Bloomenbaums.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006257.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.brothersbloom.com/"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/bloom0.jpg" border="0" height="220"></a></center><br />

<p>Well, I have to admit, I went in rooting for <a href="http://www.brothersbloom.com/">Rian Johnson's <em>The Brothers Bloom</em></a>, which I caught last week at <a href="http://www.narocinema.com/">the local arthouse</a>. Johnson has proven himself in the past to be <a href="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/003752.html#003752">a huge fan of <em>Miller's Crossing</em></a>, which always goes far in my book. (Indeed, like all good disciples of that wonderful flick, Johnson understands the crucial importance of hats. The millinery may be the best part of <em>Bloom</em>, and Johnson has the good sense to let Rachel Weisz look adorable in a bowler for a good part of the run.)<br /><br /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.brothersbloom.com/"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/bloom1.jpg" border="0" align="right" height="150"></a></p>

<p>But, sadly, the well-meaning but ultimately rather flimsy <em>Brothers Bloom</em> suffers from serious flaws. It's a relentlessly good-natured caper flick, so harping on its problems feels a bit like acting the Grinch. But, nonetheless, <em>The Brothers Bloom</em> is too coy and precious by half.  The main problem is that, for whatever reason, it's been Wes Andersonized within an inch of its life. The static shots crufted over with hyperstylized bric-a-brac, the low-fi, DIY scene cards, the many peculiar eccentricities of the upper crust, the hipster's vinyl collection of forgotten oldies comprising the soundtrack, the somewhat dubious minority characters, the jaunty, vaguely <em>Tintin</em>-ish plot -- It got to the point where I sometimes forgot if Adrien Brody was supposed to be hectored by older brother Mark Ruffalo <a href="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/004976.html">or by older brother Owen Wilson</a>.<br /><br /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.brothersbloom.com/"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/bloom2.jpg" border="0" align="left" height="150"></a></p>

<p>At any rate, <em>The Brothers Bloom</em> begins in Wes Anderson-style and never lets it go. When we first encounter the titular siblings, they're two young orphans who already dress like the Artful Dodger, and who -- moving from foster home to foster home -- are already developing a taste for the long con. Even in these early years, the fraternal dynamic is set. Stephen, the elder (eventually, Ruffalo), is the idea-man. Using large flowcharts to get his beats across, he conceives extended, needlessly elaborate cons mainly as long-winded adventure stories to amuse his little brother. Meanwhile, Bloom, the younger (soon to be Brody), is the unwitting and eventually deeply beleaguered star of Stephen's tales. Just like Tom Reagan in <em>Miller's Crossing</em>, he tends to achieve the desired outcome of his brother's gambits, but lose the girl in the process.<br /><br /></p>

<p>After they grow up, the brothers -- along with their partner-in-crime, the basically mute explosives expert Bang Bang (Rinko Kikuchi -- more on her in a bit) -- wreak havoc on various unsuspecting marks and gain notoriety all across the globe. But when Bloom has finally had enough, Stephen decides to concoct a bravura finish: A final job, one that will involve grifting a beautiful, bizarre, and deeply lonely New Jersey heiress, Penelope Stamp (Weisz). Will Bloom finally get the girl this time? Ah, no peeking -- that would ruin the trick.<br /><br /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.brothersbloom.com/"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/bloom3.jpg" border="0" align="right" height="150"></a></p>

<p><em>The Brothers Bloom</em> is as obsessed with legerdemain and sleight-of-hand as, say, <a href="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/004276.html#004276"><em>The Prestige</em></a>, and as the movie moves to its conclusion its central conceit  -- cons/tricks = seduction = storytelling = filmmaking -- grinds louder and louder. (Speaking of which, as part of <a href="http://filmdramas.suite101.com/article.cfm/christopher_nolans_the_prestige">its pledge</a> <em>Brothers</em> telegraphs relatively early that the film will end in Mexico. This is a mistake. Partly because, as the movie wears out its welcome, I found myself wishing more and more that they'd get South of the Border already. And, when the movie *doesn't* end in Mexico, it makes the convoluted, almost inchoate final act -- in Russia, in case you were wondering -- seem that much more meandering and purposeless.)<br /><br /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.brothersbloom.com/"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/bloom5.jpg" border="0" align="left" height="150"></a></p>

<p>The problem is it's hard to shake the feeling that we've seen this trick before. Like I said, this is a Wes Anderson movie through and through, and if, like me, you're kinda over that whole aesthetic at this point, you'll begin to lose interest even while Johnson is still dealing the cards. (Admittedly, the moments I liked best in <em>Bloom</em> probably count as Wes Andersonisms, from -- for me, the biggest laugh in the movie -- Rachel Weisz's three-second-turn as a club DJ to Weisz and Brody dancing the bolero aboard a pleasure cruise on a moonlit night.) And don't get me started on Robbie Coltrane, who even more than everyone else seems like an unnecessary emissary from the Andersonverse here.<br /><br /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.brothersbloom.com/"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/bloom4.jpg" border="0" align="right" height="150"></a></p>

<p>Also in the debit department, there is the matter of Bang Bang. I won't say she's a racial stereotype that's <em>offensive</em>, per se (particularly given <a href="http://movieblog.ugo.com/movies/is-transformers-2-racist">the noise coming out of <em>Transformers 2</em> this past week</a> -- it seems that bar is still set really low) --  but everything from her unfortunate name (at best a Nancy Sinatra reference, but still too chop-socky by half) to her stint doing Tokyo karaoke suggests there's a lot of really embarrassing Exotic Othering on Johnson's part going on here. Honestly, when your Asian female character has more screen time and less dialogue than Chewbacca, something has gone horribly wrong. Next time, how about write the poor girl some lines?<br /><br /></p>

<p>At any rate, I can see some folks, particularly the Anderson-inclined, being able to overlook the many flaws of <em>The Brothers Bloom</em> and just see it as an easy-on-the-eyes, unabashedly romantic caper story. I am not one of those folks -- At best, it's a rental.<br /><br /></p>

<p>[Note: I realize <em>The Brothers Bloom</em> came out ages ago for many GitM readers. But, what can I say? It got here only recently -- At the moment, I'm a victim of the limited release schedule. In a perfect world, I'd be talking about <em>Moon</em>, <em>Whatever Works</em> and/or <em>The Hurt Locker</em> right now, instead of studiously avoiding the 45 showings a day of <em>Transformers 2</em>. As it is, hopefully I can get to Michael Mann's <em>Public Enemies</em> sometime over the coming weekend.] </p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Cinema</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T10:47:47-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006256.html">
<title>Inside Men at the FEC.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006256.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>That's happened with increasing frequency at the FEC lately. Election-law experts, supporters of campaign-finance regulations, and even some members of the commission itself are expressing growing concern about a string of cases in which the three Republicans on the commission -- led by Tom DeLay's former ethics lawyer -- have voted as a block against enforcement, preventing the commission from carrying out its basic regulatory function.</em>" Pete Martin and Zachary Roth of <em>TPM Muckraker</em> delve into <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/06/the_commission_has_been_road-blocked_republicans_w_1.php?ref=fpblg">how Republicans antithetical to campaign finance reform  have effectively sabotaged the FEC</a>. "<em>The FEC, he said, has been made 'ineffective' -- and not by accident. 'This is what McConnell had in mind.'</em>"<br /><br /></p>

<p>"<em>Of course, the one person who could do the most to get the commission back on track is President Obama...Most experts believe that the White House supports stronger campaign-finance laws as a goal, but, with a host of other issues on its plate, is reluctant to pick a fight with the GOP Senate leader. 'They're picking their priorities, and they don't want to take on Mitch McConnell right now,' said Hasen. 'I consider that unfortunate.</em>'" Anyone else sensing a pattern?</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Politics (2009-2010)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T10:24:45-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006255.html">
<title>Secrets and Lies.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006255.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In the July 4th weekend trailer bin:<br /></p>

<p><LI>Four couples (Vince Vaughn/Malin Ackerman, Jon Favreau/Kristin Davis, Jason Bateman/Kristen Bell, Faison Love/Kali Hawk) work out their issues in paradise in the <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/couplesretreat/">preview for Peter Billingsley's <em>Couples Retreat</em></a>, also with Jean Reno and Ken Leong. (And, yes, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Christmas_Story"><em>that</em></a> Peter Billingsley. Anyway, not my cup of tea, really -- it looks like a paid vacation for the folks involved.)<br /></p>

<p><LI>Quentin Tarantino unleashes another look at what appears to be talky WWII torture porn in the <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=56795">international trailer for <em>Inglorious Basterds</em></a>, with Brad Pitt, Diane Kruger, Eli Roth, Melanie Laurent, Christoph Waltz, Michael Fassbinder, and Mike Myers with a variable accent. (This honestly looks worse with each trailer. Get it together, QT.)<br /></p>

<p><LI>And, most promisingly of the bunch, Matt Damon and a goofy moustache scour up the inside secrets of ADM in <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/theinformant/">our first look at Stephen Soderbergh's <em>The Informant!</em></a>, also with Scott Bakula, Tony Hale, Clancy Brown, Joel McHale, and Melanie Lynskey.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Cinema</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T10:00:19-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006254.html">
<title>Close, But...</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006254.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://soccernet.espn.go.com/report?id=266850&cc=5901"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/confedfinal.jpg" height="250" border="0"></a></center><br />

<p>Sigh...From a 2-0 lead at halftime, the <a href="http://soccernet.espn.go.com/report?id=266850&cc=5901">US falls to Brazil 3-2 in the Confederations Cup final</a>. (And it really should've been 4-2 -- The refs missed a Brazil goal in the 62nd minute.) Well, we had a good run, and <a href="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006235.html">we'll always have the Spain win</a>...onto 2010.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Soccer</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T15:35:44-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006253.html">
<title>Everything looks worse in black and white.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006253.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/fortune/0906/gallery.kodak_kodachrome.fortune/index.html"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/kodachrome.jpg" height="300" border="0"></a></center><br />

<p>They gave us those nice bright colors, they gave us the greens of summers: By way of <a href="http://www.dangerousmeta.com/">Dangerous Meta</a> and to commemorate the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-kodachrome23-2009jun23,0,5125640.story">recent discontinuing of the famous film</a>, <em>Fortune</em> offers up <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/fortune/0906/gallery.kodak_kodachrome.fortune/index.html">twenty Kodachrome images from its extensive photo archives</a>, including shots by Ansel Adams, Walker Evans, and William Vandivert. The one above, by W. Eugene Smith, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/fortune/0906/gallery.kodak_kodachrome.fortune/17.html">dates to 1957</a>.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Arts and Letters</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T13:53:34-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006252.html">
<title>Days Bygone and Egon.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006252.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>He's cool. He's jolly. The funny thing is that when I first met him [the Dalai Lama], the Tibetans were all familiar with Groundhog Day, but they didn't understand the Dalai Lama speech in Caddyshack. They're like, 'The Dalai Lama does not play golf.' I said, 'I know, I know. But if he did...'</em>"<br /><br /></p>

<p>As part of the <em>Year One</em> roll out, GQ <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/features/full?id=content_9558&pageNum=1">publishes a wide-ranging and worthwhile interview with director Harold Ramis</a>, one that pauses to consider <em>Animal House</em>, <em>Caddyshack</em>, <em>Ghostbusters</em>, <em>Groundhog Day</em>, <em>Meatballs</em>, and the strange headspace of Bill Murray. "<em>Everybody has a Bill Murray story. He just punishes people, for reasons they can't figure out. He was a student of Gurdjieff for a while, the Sufi mystic. Gurdjieff used to act really irrationally to his students, almost as if trying to teach them object lessons.</em>"</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Cinema</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T13:12:15-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006251.html">
<title>Blue Sky Mining.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006251.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/26/AR2009062600444.html"><img src="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/bluesky.jpg" height="220" border="0"></a></center><br />

<p>"<em>One of the bill's co-sponsors,  Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), said: 'The American people wanted change in our energy and climate policy. And this is the change that the people are overwhelmingly asking for.' He called it '<a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/house-passes-pelosis-signature-bill-2009-06-26.html">the most important energy and environment bill</a> in the history of our country.</em>'" After much wrangling and a half-hearted <a href="http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/06/26/house-filibuster/">GOP attempt at filibuster</a> (which is only a prerogative of the Senate), the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/26/AR2009062600444.html">House passes the Waxman-Markey climate bill</a>, <a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/111/house/1/votes/477/">219-212</a>. (Eight Republicans voted for it, 44 Dems opposed.) The "<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/01/capandtrade101.html">cap-and-trade</a>" bill "<em>would establish national limits on greenhouse gases, create a complex trading system for emission permits and provide incentives to alter how individuals and corporations use energy.</em>" [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/26/AR2009062602746.html">Key provisions</a>.]<br /><br /></p>

<p>There is some concern that the <a href="http://www.salon.com/env/feature/2009/06/27/waxman_markey/">bill has</a> <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/446444/house_passes_weak_climate_change_bill">been watered</a> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/la-0e-darling25-2009jun25-test,0,3237581.story">down too much</a> out of political necessity: "<em>While the bill's targets may seem dramatic, they are in fact less than what the science tells us is required to avoid catastrophic warming. The 2020 target in particular is far too weak and quite easy and cheap for the country to meet with efficiency, conservation, renewables and fuel-switching from coal to natural gas.</em>"<br /><br /></p>

<p>Still, environmentalists remain hopeful. "<em>It is worth noting that the original Clean Air Act -- first passed in 1963 -- also didn't do enough and was subsequently strengthened many times.</em>" And, while the bill -- which (sigh) <em>gives away</em> 85% of the new emission allowances (the heart of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emissions_trading">the "cap-and-trade" market</a> hopefully soon to emerge) to interested parties -- looks to "<em>set off a lobbying feeding frenzy</em>," groups like the NRDC seem to agree that "<em>[t]his is the best bill that can actually get through committee</em>."<br /><br /></p>

<p>Of course, now the bill <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31565446/ns/us_news-environment/">has to get through the Senate</a>, where the usual lions lie in wait. ""<em>Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma said 'It doesn't matter,' he <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-11888-Pittsburgh-Republican-Examiner~y2009m6d27-Capandtrade-bill-passes-House-has-tough-fight-in-Senate">declared flatly</a>, 'because we'll kill it in the Senate anyway</em>.'" And even some Dems are fatalistic about its prospects. "<em>Mississippi Rep. Gene Taylor (D) voted against the measure that he says will die in the Senate. 'A lot of people walked the plank on a bill that will never become law,' <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/boehner-climate-bill-a-pile-of-s--t-2009-06-27.html">Taylor told The Hill</a> after the gavel came down.</em>" Looks like Sen. Reid has his work cut out for him.<br />
 </p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>The Pelosi House</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T12:14:41-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006250.html">
<title>Atlas Hemmed and Hawed.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006250.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>Somewhere in literary-character hell, John Galt is spending an eternity getting beat down by Tom Joad & his pick handle.</em>" Ah, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand">Ayn Rand</a>...come for the vaguely kinky sex, stay for the self-serving, thoroughly reprehensible philosophy. <em>Salon</em>'s Andrew Leonard asks if the <a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2009/06/25/ayn_rand/index.html">recent economic downturn has discredited Rand's Objectivism</a> once and for all, prompting -- as you might expect -- a <a href="http://letters.salon.com/tech/htww/2009/06/25/ayn_rand/view/?show=all">war in the comments section</a> between the true believers and the gleeful cynics.<br /><br /></p>

<p>Among the many funny comments, this one, reposted from <a href="http://bit.ly/WGzCs">here</a>: "<em>There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: <a href="http://www.kevincmurphy.com/tolkien.html">The Lord of the Rings</a> and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.</em>" </p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Arts and Letters</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T11:39:30-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006249.html">
<title>The &quot;Orphans of Apollo.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006249.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>So why do tech geeks love space? Though they may have the resources -- a trip to space will now set you back some $45 million -- this can't be the full answer: You don't see Donald Trump or P. Diddy signing up for an astro-mission. What makes it worth it for the tech geeks?</em>" <em>The Big Money</em>'s Julia Ioffe tries to ascertain <a href="http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/judgments/2009/06/24/geeks-space">why dot.com miliionaires pay out the nose for space travel</a>. Uh, <a href="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/000641.html">because it's there</a>?<br /><br /></p>

<p>"'<em>There's a documentary called <a href="http://www.orphansofapollo.com/">Orphans of Apollo</a> that's stated this well,' he explained. 'There's a generation of us, who are the tech leaders of today, who were universally inspired to go into science and technology because of the NASA Lunar Space Program. And the reason the movie is called Orphans of Apollo is because, in many ways, we feel orphaned by the fact that the space industry has not done a good job of capitalizing on that momentum of what many of us believed were the first steps into space, carrying the mission of human space flight farther and farther into deep space.'</em>"</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Science</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T11:31:08-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006248.html">
<title>Forty Years and Counting.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006248.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>The cultural climate is far different today, besides. Now, roughly 75 percent of Americans support an end to Don't Ask, and gay issues are no longer a third rail in American politics. Gay civil rights history is moving faster in the country, including on the once-theoretical front of same-sex marriage, than it is in Washington. If the country needs any Defense of Marriage Act at this point, it would be to defend heterosexual marriage from the right-wing 'family values' trinity of Sanford, Ensign and Vitter.</em>"<br /><br /></p>

<p>The NYT's Frank Rich reflects on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/opinion/28rich.html">gay rights movement on the 40th anniversary of Stonewall</a>. "<em>No president possesses that magic wand, but Obama's inaction on gay civil rights is striking. So is his utterly uncharacteristic inarticulateness...It's a press cliché that 'gay supporters' are disappointed with Obama, but we should all be.</em>"</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T11:22:45-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006247.html">
<title>The Serpent on the Staff.</title>
<link>http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006247.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"<em>As a society, we trust doctors to be more concerned with the pulse of their patients than the pulse of commerce. Yet the American Medical Association is using that trust to try to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/us/politics/11health.html">block a robust public insurance option as part of health reform</a>. In fact the A.M.A. now represents only 19 percent of practicing physicians...Its membership has declined in part because of its <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-11447-LA-Science-and-Tech-News-Examiner~y2009m6d25-Above-all-do-no-harmnot-according-to-the-AMA">embarrassing historical record</a>: the A.M.A. supported segregation, opposed President Harry Truman's plans for national health insurance, backed tobacco, denounced Medicare and <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_n5_v26/ai_15261933/">opposed President Bill Clinton's health reform plan</a>.</em>"<br /><br /> </p>

<p>And don't forget <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheppard%E2%80%93Towner_Act">Sheppard-Towner</a>: In his column this week, Nicholas Kristof <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/25/opinion/25kristof.ready.html">take aim at the powerful American Medical Association</a>. "'<em>They've always been on the wrong side of things,' Dr. Scheiner told me, speaking of the A.M.A. 'They may be protecting their interests, but they're not protecting the interests of the American public.</em>'"</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>kevincmurphy</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T11:10:09-05:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
