Edwards Watch: Iffy. | No Gore ticket, period.

While Edwards donors have broken for Obama 2-1, current rumor has it that Edwards himself is inclined toward Clinton, mainly on account of his wife, Elizabeth. “‘She feels her husband should have been the man in the center of the presidential sweepstakes, rather than Obama,’ a source said.

Well, if that’s true, it’s a remarkably petty reason to back the establishment candidate. Still, sour grapes or no, it’s hard to imagine Edwards coming out for Clinton at this late date anyway. Why would he obliterate all of his outsider-reformer cachet in one fell swoop, just to back a horse that’s already lost? If he endorses Clinton now, not only is his credibility in many circles effectively reduced to zero, but he’d be needlessly prolonging a primary battle that the rest of the party is trying to end ASAP. So, if anything, I expect he’ll remain neutral at this point.

Meanwhile, Al Gore reaffirmed he’s staying out of it for now, despite calls among some for him to break the deadlock: “‘What have we got, five months left?’ Gore told the Associated Press…’I think it’s going to resolve itself, but we’ll see.’” Well, it’s more like three months, if we go by the Dean standard. Still, I can’t say I’m surprised that Gore’s letting things shake out.

Which reminds me: There’s been some loose talk recently, most notably by TIME’s Joe Klein and Rep. Tim Mahoney, that the Dems could rally around Al Gore on top of a compromise ticket, a la John W. Davis in 1924. Now, maybe I’m in the minority these days in remembering that Al Gore was a thoroughly crappy candidate in 2000, one who — despite unprecedented economic good times — couldn’t even beat a congenial idiot like Dubya back in the day. Nonetheless, this notion of putting Al Gore atop the ticket is the Mother of all Dumb Ideas, redolent of the blatantly undemocratic, smoke-filled rooms of yesteryear, and if it happens, I’m walking. In fact, I’d rather have Sen. Clinton be our standard-bearer than Al Gore: At least, she actually procured a sizable number of votes this cycle.

One thought on “Edwards Watch: Iffy. | No Gore ticket, period.”

  1. Don’t use Gore’s run against Dumbya as a yardstick, and even if you do, please remember that he DID win the popular vote. He CAN win it by a landslide with the right approach this time around, if we can just get Dem alignment around him to lock in for the nuking of the GOP 2008.

    This IS Al Gore 2008 and no other version, fresh from a public relations blitz and wearing the Nobel crown.
    He’s respectability and credibility 2.0
    and not the stiff Tennessean who bent over for Limbaugh missiles.
    This is Al Gore who can speak truth to power and utter with conviction the demands of the disenfranchised American majority.

    And that majority only has one simple job to do this time around, and that is to get the numbers up so damn high that there isn’t even the remotest chance of a contested vote count.

    Hell’s bells, it’s almost a gimme if he can just pull off the party alignment part and do it with style and grace.

Comments are closed.