Recently in Telecom Category
"I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the internet commercially." Via my sis-in-law Lotta, GOP Senator Ted "Bridge to Nowhere" Stevens (R-AK) seems more than slightly confused about the functioning of the Internets, to use Dubya's parlance.
"My guess is that something will pass this year. In the end, no one wants to be against decency in an election year." In order to increase his standing among social conservatives and protect his right flank for those all-important 2008 primaries, Catkiller Frist has started angling for a strict broadcasting indecency bill. The bill "would increase indecency fines on broadcasters and threaten to take away their licenses after three violations."
In something of a surprise move (at least in regards to timing), Michael Powell announces his resignation as FCC Chairman. From the media ownership fiasco to Powell's knee-jerk overreliance on deregulation as a general fix-all, Powell's brief tenure probably isn't going to go down as much other than an experiment gone awry, and further testament to the fact that deregulating markets doesn't necessarily lead to increased competition -- in fact, sometimes quite the opposite. Update: Stephen Labaton previews the post-Powell FCC.
Just skip over this entry if you don't feel like reading a long-winded customer complaint. Still here? Ok, Verizon Wireless is seriously annoying me. I don't use my phone for very much -- I'm not a chatter by any means, and my telephone conversation skills are legendarily lousy (Ask any of my exes.) Nevertheless, I've been using a Palm-Phone hybrid for many years now, and have thus forever lost the ability to memorize nine-digit numbers. So, given that my well-worn Kyocera QCP6035 is on its very last legs these days -- I drop calls constantly and my friends and family often sound like they're underwater -- all I want to do is replace it with a spiffy new Treo 650, available on Sprint since November. But Verizon will have nothing doing. They keep trying to ply me with a Treo 600 -- the outdated model with cruddy resolution and low battery life -- which Verizon obtained a good year after its competitors.
Really, y'all, why wouldn't you rush to offer your customers the newest phones and assorted gadgets available? (Verizon says its due to their rigorous testing procedures, but most people seem to think it's because they want to disable the Treo's Bluetooth functionality, so as to hawk further their lame Get it Now service.) Hmmm...what to do? I'm thinking of switching providers, but Verizon (nee Bell Atlantic/NYNEX) kinda owns this town. Or I might try out this widely-circulated 650 hack, if I thought my soldering skills were up to snuff. We'll see...I can probably put up with another month or so of terrible phone reception, but after that I'm resorting to drastic measures. Verizon really needs to get on the ball with the new technology. (I'm not the only ticked one, as evidenced by this petition.)
After pressure from Democratic commissioners and congressmen, Michael Powell's FCC announces an investigation into Armstrong-gate. Well, what do you know? I guess they're just killing time until someone makes the mistake of showing more scantily-clad (non-cheerleader) women at an NFL football game.
"In recent weeks, federal agencies across the vast Washington bureaucracy have delayed completion of a range of proposed regulations from food safety and the environment to corporate governance and telecommunications policy until after Election Day, when regulatory action may be more politically palatable." Apparently, the Bushies have prepared an onslaught of awful legislation that they're hiding from us until November 3. While this tends to happen every to some extent every election year, notes Consumers Union director Gene Kimmelman, "'[w]hat is unusual this time...is the clear pattern of holding back regulatory decisions that will benefit the largest industry players and will drive up prices and market place risks for consumers, ranging from telephones to drugs to the risks of contaminants of food. The pattern of slow rolling will ultimately benefit the largest players and hit consumers in the pocketbook.'" Oh, swell.
"This is a fight about freedom--the freedom of independent entrepreneurs to start and run a media business, and the freedom of citizens to get news, information, and entertainment from a wide variety of sources, at least some of which are truly independent and not run by people facing the pressure of quarterly earnings reports. No one should underestimate the danger." Fed up to the gills, Ted Turner takes on Big Media in the Washington Monthly.
By a 55-to-40 vote, the Senate overturns Powell's media ownership rules. Even if the Senate vote goes nowhere (and between the contentious House and a Dubya veto, that's pretty likely), this should hopefully awaken Michael Powell to the fact that there is significant bipartisan resistance to his agenda of carte blanche deregulation. Instead of freeing the Big Boys from any entangling agreements, perhaps Powell should work on making them honor the agreements they've already made - namely, HDTV roll-out and public interest requirements. This isn't about big government, it's about getting our money's worth. Since we've given the networks use of bandwidth valued at $70 billion, we have every right to expect something in return.
Looks like it's a bad day for imperious Dubya appointees. In the wake of Congress's recent decision to limit the powers of the Patriot Act, a defiant Ashcroft wants his toys back. Also facing considerable bipartisan and public criticism, Michael Powell appoints a task force on media consolidation. As Copps notes in the article, next time perhaps it'd be better to do the fact-finding before you vote.
Clear Channel is sued by Roxanne Cordonier, a South Carolina DJ and the 2002 state Radio Personality of the Year, for firing her for her anti-war stance. The suit also alleges that Cordonier "was forced to participate in a pro-war rally." I'll have to keep an eye on this one.
On a party line vote, the FCC eases ownership rules, paving the way for another wave of media consolidation over the nation's airwaves. With Chairman Michael Powell now playing kingmaker for the likes of Rupert Murdoch, the Commission has come a long way from low power FM in two short years.
The networks stay mum on media consolidation as the Powell FCC prepares to lift cross-ownership caps in local and regional markets. Not surprisingly, it looks like the FCC vote will be party-line, with the three Republicans voting as a bloc to facilitate Rupert Murdoch's ambitions and enlist free-market ideology in order to kill free-thinking media outlets. We'll always have the web, I guess.
Radio conglomerate Clear Channel's role in promoting the war, as noted earlier here, has raised new concerns in Washington about consolidation of the airwaves. Closer to home, the Voice isn't very happy about the company's major push into NYC.
Trouble at the Commish - Much to the chagrin of FCC Chairman Michael Powell, former Bush official and relatively new Commissioner Kevin Martin plays dealmaker in what amounts to a chaotic compromise on deregulation of the Baby Bells.
Feeling the bite of AOL-TW's 70% drop, Ted Turner sets his sights on ousting Steve Case as Chairman.
FCC Chairman Powell prepares to gut the limits on broadcast ownership, meaning everything will soon be brought to you by AOL-TW, Viacom, and Rupert Murdoch. Bad call...reinstituting monopolies isn't going to solve the crisis in telecom.
John Judis blames Michael Powell's deregulatory fixation for telecom's collapse. "Powell has proven a disaster...Like Harvey Pitt, the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Powell would be ripe for replacement--if his feckless, ideological approach didn't so perfectly reflect the president he serves." To be fair, telecom was starting to look a bit peaked before Powell was Chairman (although that's also partly because Powell was something of an obstructionist on the commission before his ascent.) And, while I'm sure it's risen lately, demand for broadband services was egregiously low back in 2000. Like campaign finance reform, it's one of those things you'd expect people to be all over, but for some reason it just isn't reflected in the numbers. Without a true "killer app" for broadband (Napster/Kazaa comes close, but it's not it), low demand will continue to be one of the reasons why the big boys aren't building out. That all being said, I agree with the fundamentals of Judis's piece.
