Recently in Peter Jackson Category
Much like Hitchhiker's Guide in 2005, I should go ahead and admit upfront that my review of Steven Spielberg's The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn probably won't be much use to many stateside. Growing up overseas in England and Belgium, I was a definite Tintin kid. So I have a pre-existing fondness for the character, and, for at least the first forty-five minutes or so of this film, I had trouble wiping off the huge "Great Snakes, a Tintin movie!" grin off of my face. (When you throw in the trailers for The Hobbit and Star Wars in 3D beforehand, it almost seems like Hollywood is explicitly trying to cater to my inner six-year-old these days. Trailers for an Asterix and/or Mr. Men movie would've completely clinched it.)
Point being, I had a different reaction to this film than I'm guessing those unfamiliar with the world of Tintin will. Even notwithstanding the joy of seeing these beloved characters come to life, The Secret of the Unicorn is filled with easter eggs for Tintin-o-philes. Our hero (Jamie Bell) has nods to Cigars of the Pharaoah, The Black Island, and King Ottokar's Sceptre on his wall. Later we encounter a crab with golden claws, a zero-G nod to Explorers on the Moon, and, as the villain's "secret weapon," a cameo by one of Captain Haddock's (Andy Serkis) more amusing adversaries. And, in the background, Spielberg and Jackson are constantly recreating sight-gags from various Tintin adventures -- say, Snowy digging up a ginormous bone in the desert --that continually conjured up ancient memories of childhood laughs within me. If you like Tintin, you'll almost assuredly have a good time here.
And if you don't know Belgium's most famous boy journalist from a hole in the ground? Well, that's a stickier wicket. The exquistely craftted chase scenes are reasonably engaging, if ever so slightly repetitive, on their own. (And a shout-out to John Williams' score, which could be my favorite work of his in at least a decade.) But if you don't know anything about these characters already, I'm not sure you'll find much of a rooting interest here. For better or for worse, this is pretty clearly a film by Tintin fans for Tintin fans. (If anything, I sometimes wish they'd hewed even closer to the books. Some of the setpieces -- say, Haddock and the bad guy (Daniel Craig) dueling with construction cranes -- felt like generic action-spectacle filler. I'd rather have seen Tintin do more detective work.)
But, whether you're new to Tintin or a veteran hand, I'm happy to report that the motion-capture animation here is the most impressive I've ever seen -- no dead eyes to speak of here. I actually thought the animation Zemeckis's Beowulf was reasonably well-done back in 2007, but this is better by an order of magnitude. (It helps that Spielberg and Jackson have forgone the uncanny valley by going for a Herge-plus look.) In fact, the two things I was most afraid of not working going in -- the motion-capture animation and Snowy -- are probably the two highlights of the film. (Tintin's faithful companion is a scene-stealer through and through.) Conversely, the character who I thought would be an easy slam dunk, Captain Haddock, actually grows somewhat tiresome over the course of the movie. (The swearing plays, but all the alcoholic tendencies that are funny on paper begin to grate in three dimensions.)Speaking of three dimensions, I caught this in 3D, but I'm not sure it really added much to the experience -- especially when you factor in that a 3D movie ticket now costs all of $15.50(!) here in the District. I know I recently hated on the 3D push in my Hugo review, but, still, that price for one ticket to a 100 minute film is verging on the ridiculous. My advice: Take your kids to Tintin, but spend 2D money, and use the savings to buy them one of the books.
"Far over the Misty Mountains cold, to dungeons deep and caverns old..." Also materializing online, as of last night, is the first trailer for Peter Jackson's The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Looks great, although I'm a little wary of the Twilight-style division of the book (presumably, Smaug is in the second film), as well as the "original trilogy" tone -- The Hobbit is more whimsical; it shouldn't just be a prequel to the Lord of the Rings. (Also, "prequel to the original trilogy" is a phrase that deservedly spawns doubt in the hearts of many in the world of men this age.) But, all in all, this looks splendid. One year to go!
ComingSoon.Net shows off the spiffy new poster for The Adventures of Tintin. Not groundbreaking or anything, but Tintin et al look better here to me than they did in the trailer.
Far over the misty mountains cold, to dungeons deep and caverns old, we must away ere break of day to seek the pale enchanted gold. After revealing the rest of the dwarven company, Peter Jackson & co release a pic of Richard Armitage as Thorin Oakenshield. Looks younger than I've imagined, but it's hard to disentangle my vision of Thorin from the Rankin/Bass cartoon at this late date.
Update: If you have a hankering to see these dwarves in action, PJ has released another fun production video, below.
In the trailer bin, a ginger-haired boy journalist and his trusty canine sidekick uncover a clue to a long lost treasure in the first full trailer for Steven Spielberg's The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn, with Jamie Bell, Andy Serkis, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, and Daniel Craig. Hmm...the mo-cap looks even better than Beowulf, but I'm still not sold on the look, and Snowy/Milou in particular conjurs up grim visions of Scooby-Doo. Why not just replicate the traditional Hergé style?
While summer swelters stateside, Peter Jackson and co. are thankfully hard at work on The Hobbit. Here's the second production diary (and the first, if you missed it.) And some production stills: Above we have Nori (Jed Brophy), Ori (Adam Brown), and Dori (Mark Hadlow), and below we have Oin (John Callen) and Gloin (Peter Hamilton) next to Fili (Dean O'Gorman) and Kili (Aidan Turner). That's seven dwarves accounted for -- six more presumably to follow in short order.
Update: Three more dwarves -- or maybe three and a half, depending on how you count Bombur - materialize: Bombur (Stephen Hunter), Bofur (James Nesbitt), and Bifur (William Kircher). Note what appears to be a large chunk of metal embedded in the latter's forehead.
Update 2: Almost there...Here's Balin (Ken Stott) and Dwalin (Graham McTavish).
Update 3: And Thorin Oakenshield is here.
"'There's no way you can pace yourself for shoots like these,' Jackson says. 'When we were going through the schedule for The Hobbit, I felt a terrible drop in my stomach when I saw that we'd be shooting for 254 days. We're only 12 days short of The Lord of the Rings even though we're only doing two movies.'
More big news from Middle-Earth: EW gets the first official pic of Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins. "'He fits the ears, and he's got some very nice feet,' Jackson says of his Bilbo. 'I think he's got the biggest hobbit feet we've had so far. They're a little bit hard to walk in, but he's managed to figure out the perfect hobbit gait.'"
Some recent news on the Hobbiton front: Peter Jackson has rounded out the casting of An Unexpected Journey and There and Back Again (some solid titlage there, by the way) with Evangeline Lilly as an elf named Tauriel, Barry "Dame Edna" Humphries as the Goblin King, Luke Evans as Bard the Bowman, and Bilbo's investigatory companion, Sherlock's Benedict Cumberbatch, as the voice of Smaug. "As well as playing Smaug, Cumberbatch is voicing the Necromancer, the evil Mirkwood sorcerer who is revealed in the Lord of the Rings to be the evil spirit Sauron." (Smaug pic via here.)
Blue blistering bell-bottomed balderdash! Along with the spiffy poster above, the teaser for Steven Spielberg's The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn is now online.
Hmmm. As a Tintin kid, I'm really looking forward to these movies. But, for now, I am not feeling the decision to go photorealistic with this at all. Snowy/Milou should not conjure grim memories of Scooby-Doo and Yogi Bear. Here's hoping a few more rotations in the CGI-machine smooths this out some.
The Hobbit has officially commenced shooting in New Zealand -- at a history-making 48 frames per second, no less -- and kindly keeping us in the loop is Peter Jackson, with an eleven minute tour of the final days of pre-production. If you have any love for the first films at all, I think you'll enjoy this quite a bit.
"Mr. Freeman at least lived up to Mr. Jackson's billing, offering a comic denial that the 'Hobbit' project was cursed. Despite the many setbacks the films had faced, Mr. Freeman told Agence France-Presse, "we're ready to go - just as soon as 2015 comes around." While PJ recovers from recent surgery, the cast of The Hobbit get ready to embark on a grand adventure. Cue the Glenn Yarborough...
In related news: In Soviet Russia, the Ring carries you...Salon's Laura Miller takes a gander at Yisroel Markov's The Last Ringbearer, a Russian fan-fictiony novel purporting to tell the War of the Ring from Sauron's side. "In Yeskov's retelling, the wizard Gandalf is a war-monger intent on crushing the scientific and technological initiative of Mordor and its southern allies because science 'destroys the harmony of the world and dries up the souls of men!' He's in cahoots with the elves, who aim to become 'masters of the world,' and turn Middle-earth into a 'bad copy' of their magical homeland across the sea."
"[W]orking with Peter Jackson is like working with a family. So they'll have a great time. Saoirse's family will go too, everyone is very close and very loving on those sorts of jobs." Saoirse Ronan, late of Adaptation and The Lovely Bones and soon of Hanna, is apparently heading to Middle Earth as part of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. (Get well soon, PJ.) Hmm...an elf, perhaps? She has the look.
Five armies, seventh Doctor? The cast for Peter Jackson's The Hobbit fills out further with Sylvester McCoy (Radagast the Brown), Ken Stott (Balin), Mikael Persbrandt (Beorn), Ryan Gage (Drogo Baggins), Jed Brophy (Nori), William Kircher (Bifur), and, back for more, Cate Blanchett as Galadriel. [Earlier casting here.] Very glad to see this moving along.
"The first part of the film, which is the most mysterious part, certainly owes much to not only film noir but the whole German Brechtian theatre -- some of our night scenes and our action scenes are very contrasty. But at the same time the movie is a hell of an adventure."
In the new Empire Magazine, Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson talk The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn, and show off the boy reporter's new Final Fantasy-ish look. (The cover above mirrors a famous drawing of Tintin that I have up in my work-cube.)
In the same story, PJ talks about where he might take Tintin after the Secret of the Unicorn/Red Rackham arc covered in Spielberg's film. "One of my favourites is The Seven Crystal Balls, so that's the one I've always been thinking of,' he says. 'I also really like the Eastern European ones, the Balkan ones like King Ottokar's Sceptre and The Calculus Affair. I think it's a terrific setting for a thriller, the weird Balkan politics and the mysterious secret service agents. I think the Moon ones are terrific, but they'd be good for the third or fourth Tintin film, if we get that far. We want to keep his feet on the ground just a little bit longer." As a Tintin kid, I'm really looking forward to these.
"James's charm, warmth and wit are legendary as is his range as an actor in both comedic and dramatic roles. We feel very lucky to be able to welcome him as one of our cast." Peter Jackson fills out his Dwarf Company with James Nesbitt and Adam Brown as Bofur and Ori respectively. "Adam is a wonderfully expressive actor and has a unique screen presence. I look forward to seeing him bring Ori to life."
And, elsewhere in fanboy casting news, Andrew Garfield's Peter Parker (and Marc Webb's Spiderman) may soon have some caretakers in Martin Sheen as Uncle Ben and Sally Field as Aunt Mary. Compared to Rhys Ifans as The Lizard, that casting seems pretty by-the-book. Still not bad...but do we really have to sit through the origin story again?
"'We'll use many of the same characters as we have all along, and we'll be introducing some new ones,' Nolan said cryptically." Lots of big doings on the fanboy front recently: First up, the next Batman movie has a (lousy) title: The Dark Knight Rises, and Chris Nolan has announced the Riddler will not be the villain. (He earlier wrote off Mr. Freeze.) So whomever Tom Hardy turns out to be, it's not Edward Nigma. (My current guess is he's Killer Croc, with a yet-to-be-cast Catwoman as the main villain.)
Riddles may not feature in Gotham, but they will soon be spun in deepest Wellington: In happy news, New Zealand will be returning as Middle Earth for the upcoming Hobbit films. "'Making the two movies here will not only safeguard work for thousands of New Zealanders, but will also allow us to follow the success of the 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy in once again promoting New Zealand on the world stage,' [Prime Minister!] Key said."
Those are the two big upcoming guns. But, also on the docket, James Cameron officials signs up for two more Avatars for 2014 and 2015. Well...ok. I can think of other worlds I'd rather see him tackle than Pandora again.
And, with Black Swan opening very soon, Darren Aronofsky announces his next project (after, um, Wolverine 2), will be called Machine Man. "Machine Man, not to be confused with the Marvel Comics character, concerns a tech engineer who, tired of going through life average and unnoticed, replaces parts of his body with titanium upgrades of his own design. He then discovers that he isn't the only one with plans for his new body."
"In light of ongoing delays in the setting of a start date for filming The Hobbit, I am faced with the hardest decision of my life. After nearly two years of living, breathing and designing a world as rich as Tolkien's Middle Earth, I must, with great regret, take leave from helming these wonderful pictures."
As a result of the continuing fiasco at MGM (complicating any projects moving forward), Guillermo del Toro leaves The Hobbit. FWIW, the project is still moving forward, with Del Toro still writing the scripts with the LotR team and Peter Jackson saying he'll direct if it comes down to it.
Del Toro's leaving is unfortunate, but it sounds like the films are far enough along in pre-production already that they'll carry some of his vision and ingenuity regardless. Still, this brings us back to 2007...Sam Raimi? Alfonso Cuaron? Peter Weir? Neil Blomkamp?
That other "vaguely religious-themed movie" I mentioned I saw between The Book of Eli and Legion? That would be Peter Jackson's well-meaning, meandering adaptation of Alice Sebold's The Lovely Bones. And in all honesty, given the atrocious reviews it received, The Lovely Bones was better and more enjoyable than I had feared going in. Still, it works better as What Dreams May Come-style eye candy than as a movie on its own terms.
Put simply, the main problem here is the source material. Even more than John Hillcoat's take on The Road, which I thought was an admirable adaptation of a so-so tome, The Lovely Bones the movie is, imho, about a good a film as you could make from such a lousy and overrated book. Now, I understand Sebold's novel has spoken to a lot of people. But I am not one of those people. I found it to be ghastly, overwritten. Oprahesque nonsense, and finishing the durned thing felt like a chore. And even with PJ at the helm, sadly, The Lovely Bones remains several hours of mostly needless despair-pr0n.
If you haven't read the book, the gist is this: It's early December, 1973, and our 14-year-old narrator, Susie Salmon (here, a very good Saiorse Ronan, formerly of Atonement), one day makes the mistake of following her creepy neighbor (Stanley Tucci) into his newly-constructed evil underground lair. There, she is raped and murdered. (This grisly event takes us to about page 20, iirc.) Susie goes to Heaven -- or a Heaven-like Limbo, in any event -- while her family grieves and gnashes and laments and wails for 300 pages. Oh, and eventually there's some ghost sex. Yes, really.
Fair enough, but how do they gnash and wail? Well, Ma Salmon (Rachel Weisz) refuses to deal with the loss and its consequences -- She turns Susie's room into an untouched tomb, has an escapist affair with the detective on the case (Michael Imperioli), and eventually runs off to pick grapes somewhere. Pa Salmon (Mark Wahlberg) handles it even worse -- The murder upsets his primal sense of order about the universe, and he obsessively tracks down the killer on his own for years to come. Grandma (Susan Sarandon) moves in to try to fill the void left by the distant parents, when she's sober. And Susie's siblings, Lindsey (Rose McIver) and Buckley (Christian Thomas Ashdale), grow up and live their lives, although Lindsey has some sneaking suspicions about the creep next door...
Peter Jackson and his LotR writing team (Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens) have made a few changes here and there. Most notably (and very thankfully), Susie's rape is now only vaguely implied rather than shown. (To those who question this change, I'm with Ronan: What in blue blazes is wrong with you?) Here, Susie's murder is quite gracefully handled, although I could've done with less spider-toying-with-the-fly type stuff before the horrible deed is committed. And Ma Salmon's romance with the detective is gone -- now it's just occasional long looks. Otherwise, they follow what I remember of the book pretty closely here.
Which is a lot of the problem. Like the book, The Lovely Bones is mostly inchoate and shapeless. As in the novel, there's no real through-line or sense of momentum in the story. It moves without purpose -- Time passes, stuff happens. Look, Susie is playing in her beautiful heaven...oh wait, she's sad...hey, let's have a grandma montage...ok, Tucci is still creepy...hey, look, more heaven....oooh, Marky Mark is on the warpath...and so on. I suspect folks who complain about the last thirty minutes of Return of the King will not have much fun with this one -- the whole movie has that languid, meandering, "oh and another thing" feel to it.
That being said, The Lovely Bones is quite pretty to look at. (Thanks, Team WETA!) Despite the awfulness of the subject matter, Bones has a very crisp and colorful presentation that soothes the eye even as the story bogs down. And the performances are all pretty good here -- especially Ronan -- with one minor exception. His Oscar nod aside, Stanley Tucci is probably the weak link here. Like Peter Sarsgaard in An Education, he's way too much of an off-putting mouth-breather to take seriously. Playing the killer as more sociable and self-assured -- like Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu in the original version of The Vanishing -- would've added a lot more menace to this thankless character.
So, given what he had to work with here, I thought Peter Jackson et al actually turned in a pretty quality product. (The real problem was trying to adapt Sebold's book in the first place.) So, no harm, no foul, so to speak: The Lovely Bones is by no means a bad movie -- It just sorta is. If you really want to see Peter Jackson tackle a story involving fantastical visions, teenage girls, and unspeakable acts of murder, I'd recommend his earlier classic, Heavenly Creatures. As for Bones, my thoughts on it are pretty much akin to my sneaking suspicions about a film I haven't yet seen, Lee Daniels' Precious. In this world, sadly, really horrible things happen to good and innocent people every single day...but that doesn't mean we have to wallow in the fact.
"If I did Titanic today, I'd do it very differently. There wouldn't be a 750-foot-long set. There would be small set pieces integrated into a large CGI set. I wouldn't have to wait seven days to get the perfect sunset for the kiss scene. We'd shoot it in front of a green screen, and we'd choose our sunset." In Newsweek and Slate, James Cameron and Peter Jackson talk about the future of cinema. "Actors will never be replaced. The thought that somehow a computer version of a character is going to be something people prefer to look at is a ludicrous idea. It's just paranoia."
Since it's a lazy Sunday morning, which I'm about to spend watching football with one eye while catching up on work, and since it occurred to me earlier this weekend that the trifecta of Fame, Pandorum, and Surrogates just has to be the lamest movie weekend we've seen in many moons, here's the rest of the fall film schedule. If a movie is listed below without parentheses, it's on my must-see list -- Movies in paras are definitely-maybes. Also, some of these, particularly the ones in and around xmastime, may be limited release on the date given.
Out now: (The Baader-Meinhof Complex)
Oct. 2: A Serious Man. (Capitalism: A Love Story, The Invention of Lying, Whip It)
Oct. 9: (An Education, Zombieland)
Oct. 16: Where the Wild Things Are. (New York, I Love You)
Oct. 23: Amelia. (Astro Boy, Anti-Christ, Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant)
Oct. 30: (Gentlemen Broncos)
Nov. 6: The Men Who Stare at Goats. (The Box)
Nov. 13: (2012, Pirate Radio)
Nov. 20: (Red Cliff)
Nov. 25: The Road. (Nine, The Fantastic Mr. Fox, Me and Orson Welles)
Dec. 4: Up in the Air.
Dec. 11: The Lovely Bones. (Invictus)
Dec. 18: Avatar.
Dec. 25: The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus. (Sherlock Holmes)
A murdered Saiorse Ronan settles into her own personal Heaven -- as her family languishes in purgatory -- in the long-awaited trailer for Peter Jackson's The Lovely Bones, also with Mark Wahlberg (not Ryan Gosling), Rachel Weisz, Susan Sarandon, Stanley Tucci, Rose McIver, Amanda Michalka, and Michael Imperioli. I wasn't a fan of the Alice Sebold novel, to be honest, but I'm very curious to see what PJ & Fran (& Brian Eno) have come up with here.
In the trailer bin of late:
And, as Comic-Con 2009 is just kicking off:
Billions of bilious blue blistering barnacles in a thundering typhoon! Steven Spielberg (and Peter Jackson)'s The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn gets a release date -- December 23, 2011. "Starring Jamie Bell (Billy Elliot) as Tintin, the intrepid young reporter whose relentless pursuit of a good story thrusts him into a world of high adventure, and Daniel Craig (Quantum of Solace) as the nefarious Red Rackham, the international cast also includes Andy Serkis, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Gad Elmaleh, Toby Jones and Mackenzie Crook."
"We've decided to have 'The Hobbit' span the two movies, including the White Council and the comings and goings of Gandalf to Dol Guldur," says Del Toro." Peter Jackson and Guillermo del Toro announce they've done away with the idea of a second "filler" movie (an idea I never cottoned to) after The Hobbit, instead choosing to expand Tolkien's tome over 4-5 hours. This is good news, precious. Good news indeed.
In honor of the character's 80th birthday (or 560th, if we're talking about Snowy), fans and future trilogy directors Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson brandish Thompson hats and umbrellas while talking Tintin. Now that Zack Snyder's Watchmen has come and gone, I suppose it's Tintin that's the next "I can't believe they're really making a big-budget film version of this" beloved property of my youth. (Which probably means that, sometime around my 40th birthday, David Fincher's Mr. Men will be hitting the multiplexes as well.)
"I think I just have a natural operatic aesthetic. I can’t help it. People have said to me, when they talk about the graphic novel, about how it’s gritty and real, and I always go, 'Yeah, you realize also though that a lot of that book takes place on Mars.'" By way of a friend, Watchmen director Zack Snyder talks with the NYT about the recent lawsuit, the challenges of adaptation, The Dark Knight, Alan Moore, transient cephalopods, and other matters. (I'd really skip this one if you haven't read the book and want to go in unspoiled.) "In the end, all I would hope is that geek culture, this movie gives geek culture a little bit of cred."
Also, for the record, I could honestly care less about the lack-of-squid issue that's riled up the purists. The squid was a means to an end (and a riff on the wildy convoluted Dr. Evil-ish plots and goofy villains like Starro one tends to find in Golden Age comics), not the actual point of the graphic novel. In fact, I'd say the absent Scouring of the Shire from PJ's LotR trilogy is a much more glaring omission, in terms of changing the actual meaning of the story...and those turned out ok, didn't they?
Word comes down today that (as rumored way back in 2004) Jamie Bell will replace Thomas Sangster as Tintin, and Daniel Craig will play the fearsome Red Rackham, in Steven Spielberg's forthcoming The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn, first of the planned mo-cap trilogy. Moreover, Shaun of the Dead scribe Edgar Wright has given Stephen Moffat's script a polish. (As reported earlier, Andy Serkis is Captain Haddock and Wright's usual brothers-in-arms are Thomson and Thompson respectively.)
Hmm. With Spielberg's first film likely covering Unicorn and Rackham, I wonder if PJ's contribution will involve Destination Moon/Explorers on the Moon or The Seven Crystal Balls/Prisoners of the Sun. And Toby Jones is now among the cast too, it seems...Professor Calculus?
Doctor, doctor, can't you see they're burning, burning? I missed this rumor when it first got some run last September, but apparently AICN has confirmed it: Fanboy brothers-in-arms Simon Pegg and Nick Frost of Spaced, Shaun of the Dead, and Hot Fuzz have been cast as the Thompson twins in the forthcoming PJ/Spielberg Tintin films. Now that's great casting, particularly as they're pretty much impossible to tell apart.
In other Tintin news I missed, Thomas Sangster (a.k.a. Tintin) is now off the project due to scheduling conflicts (and writer Stephen Moffatt also left to pursue Who.) But Andy Serkis is still Haddock, and Jackson and Spielberg are still directing the first two installments.
As discovered while tracking down the first three Coraline posters above: In an intriguing meeting of the minds, it seems Peter Jackson has locked down the very talented Brian Eno to score The Lovely Bones for him.
For a possible taste of things to come, you really can't go wrong with "By this River" (or anything off of 1977's Before and After Science, for that matter) or "And Then So Clear," from 2005's Another Day on Earth.) As these two songs suggest, Eno will no doubt come up with something appropriately ethereal, evocative, otherworldly, and beautiful for Jackson's long-awaited adaptation.
"I think that she was a remarkable lady, an iconic figure in pop culture who influenced sexuality, taste in fashion, someone who had a tremendous impact on our society." (The notorious) Bettie Page, 1923-2008.
For an appreciation of Page, see TIME's Richard Corliss, who today delivers a tribute as gushing and fanboy in its own way as Peter Jackson's moving remembrance of Forry Ackerman earlier this week. (1916-2008.) "But what everyone remembers about Bettie, aside from her trademark bangs, is her smile. Guileless and guiltless, it conveyed an Edenic sensuality. To her fans and her official detractors, who might have agreed that sex was dirty, Bettie's giddy energy said, 'Heck, no, it's fun!'"
"Literally, like every week, what you discover writing the two movies...it changes. So, every week there's a discovery, and anything we say this week would be contradicted next week. Certainly that would be true in casting. Why create hopes or why create expectations if down the line you're going to go, 'You know what? That was not a good idea."
While promoting the Hellboy II Blu-Ray, Guillermo del Toro gives a brief status update on The Hobbit, and, in discussing Smaug, once again sings the praises of Matthew Robbins' 1981 Dragonslayer. "The design of the Vermithrax Pejorative is perhaps one of the most perfect creature designs ever made. So, what you have to be careful is not to try to be distinctive just to be distinctive, but Smaug has certain characteristics that make him unique already." (FWIW, along with Excalibur, Clash of the Titans, Tron, and The Black Hole, Dragonslayer is one of the films in that first post-Star Wars genre boom that I count among my earliest movie theater memories. It was also featured prominently in the fan-made Hobbit teaser of several years ago. Good stuff, that.)
Update: Apparently, del Toro is still thinking on Lovecraft as well.
A doctrinal schism in Wellington? Peter Jackson's The Lovely Bones goes on filming hiatus while PJ and his art director clash over their respective visions of Heaven. (Somewhere, Howard Shore nods ruefully.) Earlier, the project was stalled by Ryan Gosling leaving over "creative differences" the day before shooting, to be replaced by Mark Wahlberg (a la Stuart Townsend and Viggo Mortensen.) Take note, Mr. del Toro, before you rush to embrace animatronics...
Indiana is May 6. Indiana Jones is May 22. And, while WB's cadre of lawyers try to lock down various versions of the Dark Knight trailer, the new Kramerized Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull trailer has also popped up online. I'm still of 2 minds about Indy 4. It could be a great throwback, it could be Attack of the Clones...but at least we only have to wait a few weeks to know the score. (In fact, Indy IV will close out four weeks of Fanboy May(hem), beginning tomorrow with Iron Man, followed by Speed Racer (5/9) and Prince Caspian (5/16).
Regarding much-anticipated projects further down the pike, Guillermo del Toro has been confirmed for The Hobbit, as has Ian McKellen. "'Yes, it’s true,' he said. 'I spoke to Guillermo in the very room that Peter Jackson offered me the part and he confirmed that I would be reprising the role. Obviously, it’s not a part that you turn down, I loved playing Gandalf.'" I'm obviously hugely excited for this project, but, still...that second filler movie attached to The Hobbit sounds like it could end up being a colossally bad idea.
Update: Also out today, Edward Norton wrestles with the angry, powerful alpha male inside him in the new trailer for Louis Leterrier's Incredible Hulk. Pfff...Tyler could still take him in a fight.
"Encouragingly, Peter and Fran Walsh have told me they couldn't imagine The Hobbit without their original Gandalf. Their confidence hasn't yet been confirmed by the director Guillermo del Toro but I am keeping my diary free for 2009!" Grey Havens be damned, Ian McKellen reports he's likely returning as Gandalf for The Hobbit (well, if he and producer Peter Jackson have anything to say about it, and they probably will.) Update: More good news: Composer Howard Shore is back as well.
Also in movie news, the viral marketing campaign for The Dark Knight is picking up again. As you may remember, a slew of new Gotham-related sites appeared last December. Now, more have arrived, of a distinctly Harvey Dent bent: A new edition of The Gotham Times, Dana Worthington for DA (a.k.a. Harvey Dent's opposition), Maiden Avenue Report (Gotham's Drudge, it seems), Citizens for Batman, St. Swithuns Church, and Gotham Cable News are all now online, along with the Dent campaign site linked to the other day. Also, apparently the original marketing plan was always to shift from the Joker to Harvey Dent, so this rollout hasn't necessarily been affected by the loss of Ledger. (That being said, viral text messages seem to indicate the Clown Prince of Crime will pop up yet again before April Fool's Day.)
"An executive who worked with Sangster in Los Angeles recently told me: 'Thomas seems to be the one. He was just great, but I'm not certain if anything has been finalised yet.'" Spielberg and PJ look to have found their Tintin, and it's Thomas Sangster, formerly of Love, Actually (but I'll try not to hold it against him.) He joins Andy Serkis as Captain Haddock and...hey, it's mocap...can we get Berk as Snowy/Milou?
The fruits of the Compass? After forty years from Reefer Madness to Semi-Pro (with, of course, PJ's Rings trilogy being the notable highlight), New Line Cinema is no more. "The company will lay off hundreds of employees and be merged into its corporate sibling, Warner Bros...In a sign of retrenchment that is increasingly prevalent in Hollywood, the company will now focus on making fewer movies limited to the kind of smaller, low-cost 'genre' horror and comedy pictures upon which it built its name." (Nevertheless, the Tolkien suit will go forward.)
"Few filmmakers have the cachet that del Toro has, as well as a deep love for the source material, an assured grasp of fantasy filmmaking and an understanding and command of geek culture as well as its respect." In a realm blissfully removed from the political fight engaging these lands, Guillermo del Toro seemingly gets the nod for The Hobbit. That works. I might've preferred Alfonso Cuaron, or a more adventurous pick, such as Peter Weir. Still, del Toro has proven he can probably do The Hobbit justice, and he seems just as Hobbity as PJ, in his own right.
 |  |  |
Smaug awakens! "I'm very pleased that we've been able to put our differences behind us, so that we may begin a new chapter with our old friends at New Line. 'The Lord of the Rings' is a legacy we proudly share with Bob and Michael, and together, we share that legacy with millions of loyal fans all over the world. We are delighted to continue our journey through Middle Earth." Paging Glenn Yarbrough...Peter Jackson and New Line have made up, and he and wife Fran Walsh have been named as Executive Producers for two forthcoming Hobbit movies, to be shot simultaneously in the manner of LotR -- Production starts immediately. (This is no doubt partly the fruit of The Golden Compass bombing...New Line needs cash.) Of course, executive producing is not directing...does this clear the way for Sam Raimi to take the helm? Or what of Peter Weir? Martin Freeman as Bilbo? And how will The Hobbit, more of a simple children's adventure than Rings, be broken in two anyway? (Will they beef up the Sauron at Dol Guldur stuff?) We'll know in good time...But, PJ, I'm glad you're with us. [Freeman fake via here.] Update: PJ is definitely not directing.
Dictatorial duck billed diplodocus! Motion-capture veteran Andy Serkis joins Peter Jackson and Steven Spielberg's Tintin trilogy, most likely as the inimitable Captain Haddock.
"Notwithstanding our personal quarrels, I really respect and admire Peter and would love for him to be creatively involved in some way with The Hobbit." Oh really? Bob Shaye of New Line tries to kiss and make up with Peter Jackson, most likely to secure his ok (and a producer cred) for a forthcoming Sam Raimi-directed Hobbit."Raimi has previously said he would not take on the project without Jackson's blessing and is apparently leaning towards it as his next project rather than the 'Clash of the Titans' remake."
Can't say I'm all that excited about the project, but I am obviously a fan of the director: The lovely Rachel Weisz joins Peter Jackson's version of The Lovely Bones, as the mother of the narrator, it seems.
Thundering son of a sea-gherkin! Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson are teaming up for a Tintin trilogy! "Sources said Monday that Jackson and Spielberg would each direct installments of the franchise...The movies would be made using motion-capture technology."
Peter Weir for The Hobbit? Hmm. I find that more interesting than a Raimi-directed outing, particularly after Spiderman 3, but I still think PJ should have right of first refusal.
"Peter Jackson might be the best filmmaker on the planet right now. But, um, I don't know what's going to happen next for me right now. First and foremost, those are Peter Jackson and Bob Shaye's films. If Peter didn't want to do it, and Bob wanted me to do it -- and they were both ok with me picking up the reins -- that would be great. I love the book. It's maybe a more kid-friendly story than the others." As Spiderman 3 gets its Tokyo premiere, Sam Raimi discusses the possible Hobbit in his future. Well, Raimi isn't a bad choice by any means. But, even despite New Line's bad behavior of late, this should really be PJ's film to make, and anything less will seem a disappointment.
"I don't want to work with that guy anymore. Why would I? So the answer is he will never make any movie with New Line Cinema again while I'm still working for the company." More troubling news for The Hobbit: In an interview with Sci-Fi Wire, New Line president Robert Shaye lays into Peter Jackson over the outstanding lawsuit filed by Wingnut films over ascertaining LotR revenues. (PJ's response is here, and I'm inclined to agree with him. What reason would New Line have to hide the books, unless they've been practicing shady math?)
"This outcome is not what we anticipated or wanted, but neither do we see any positive value in bitterness and rancor. We now have no choice but to let the idea of a film of The Hobbit go and move forward with other projects...We got to go there - but not back again..." In an e-mail to The One Ring, PJ and Fran say they're off The Hobbit due to outstanding and unresolved matters regarding their lawsuit against New Line, who want to move on the project now before they lose the rights. MGM (who owns the distribution rights) says it ain't over yet, but, my, it's not looking good.
Quite a bit of movie news lately: Bryan Singer's next Superman achieves liftoff, as does Harold & Kumar II. (I didn't think much of Superman Returns, but am willing to give Singer another shot, particularly given how much better X2 was over X-Men. As for H & K...yeah, I'll see it.) Meanwhile, the Peter Jackson-produced Halo is off for now...probably not a great loss, I suspect. And, finally, Steven Soderbergh and Benicio del Toro's Che is now two films: The Argentine and Guerrilla, to be shot back-to-back.
As MGM announces it's planning The Hobbit as a tentpole release (with New Line, and hopefully with Peter Jackson at the helm), PJ contemplates optioning the Termeraire books by Naomi Novik. Get back to Bag End, Pete!
Is something stirring in Middle Earth? While Peter Jackson announces he's producing a remake of The Dam Busters (to be directed by Christian Rivers, WETA's head animatic guy from LotR and Kong), very vague rumors emerge from the head office at New Line of a July 2007 start date for filming of The Hobbit. Let's hope they at least give PJ the right of first refusal...Giving this property to somebody like Ratner would be absolutely criminal. Update: Another intriguing LotR link (albeit from the Mises Institute), via Dangerous Meta: Tolkien v. Power.
As most of y'all likely already know, this past weekend was Comic-Con 2006 in San Diego, which means an exceedingly large amount of news in the fanboy department. To wit:
"Until when chance came, it ensnared a new bearer..." Breaking news from Gondor: The first of what promises to be many re-issues of Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy happens August 29, when all three films will be re-released as 2-disc sets ($28.98 each.) "For each film, disc one presents both the theatrical version of the film and its extended edition through seamless branching, while disc two features an intimate, never-before-seen documentary created by Costa Botes. The feature-length documentaries, with more than 300 minutes of never-before-available footage, focus on a number of complexities and circumstances [that] affected the making of the movies." Since I own both the theatrical cuts and three extended versions, I really have no business buying these, particularly as they don't seem to include the much-noted blooper reels or any of the still-missing footage (The Watchers of Cirith Ungol, for example.) But the hearts of Men are easily corrupted, and the Ring of Power has a will of its own.
After winning Empire Magazine's Best Picture award, PJ offers up a slow-loading and decently funny King Kong blooper reel, which includes several F-bombs, a chronically mumbling Jack Black, and the missing "Back to New York" scene. Update: Try here instead.
Happy New Year's Eve to everyone..I'm celebrating in San Diego with old college friends and likely won't update again until 2006. So, without further ado, here's the 2005 movie round-up. Overall, it's been a pretty solid year for cinema, and this is the first year in the past five where the #1 movie wasn't immediately obvious to me. But, still, choices had to be made, and so...
[Note: The #1 movie of 2005 changed in early 2006: See the Best of 2006 list for the update...]
1. Syriana: I know Stephen Gaghan's grim meditation on the global reach and ruthlessness of the Oil Trade rubbed some people the wrong way, but I found it a gripping piece of 21st century muckraking, in the venerable tradition of Ida Tarbell and Upton Sinclair. True, Christopher Plummer was a mite too sinister, but otherwise Syriana offered some of the most intriguing character arcs of the year, from morose CIA Field Agent George Clooney's ambivalent awakening to corporate lawyer Jeffrey Wright's courtship with compromise. In a year of well-made political films, among them Good Night, and Good Luck, Munich, Lord of War, and The Constant Gardener, Syriana was the pick of the litter.
2. Layer Cake: If X3 turns into the fiasco the fanboy nation is expecting with Brett Ratner at the helm, this expertly-crafted crime noir by Matthew Vaughn will cut that much deeper. Layer Cake not only outdid Guy Ritchie's brit-gangster oeuvre in wit and elegance and offered great supporting turns by Michael Gambon, Kenneth Cranham, and Colm Meaney, it proved that Daniel Craig had the requisite charisma for Bond and then some (and that Sienna Miller is no slouch in the charisma department either.)
3. Ballets Russes: Penguins and comedians, to the wings -- The lively survivors of the Ballets Russes are now on center stage. Like the best in dance itself, this captivating, transporting documentary was at once of the moment and timeless.
4. Good Night, and Good Luck: Conversely, anchored by David Strathairn's wry channeling of Edward R. Murrow, George Clooney's second film (and second appearance on the 2005 list) couldn't have been more timely. A historical film that in other hands might have come off as dry, preachy edutainment, Good Night, and Good Luck instead seemed as fresh and relevant as the evening news...well, that is, if the news still functioned properly.
5. Batman Begins: The Dark Knight has returned. Yes, the samurai-filled first act ran a bit long and the third-act train derailing needed more oomph. Still, WB and DC's reboot of the latter's second biggest franchise was the Caped Crusader movie we've all been waiting for. With help from an A-list supporting cast and a Gotham City thankfully devoid of Schumacherian statuary, Chris Nolan and Christian Bale brought both Batman and Bruce Wayne to life as never before, and a Killing Joke-ish Batman 2 is now on the top of my want-to-see list.
6. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: As I said in my original review, I initally thought Cuaron's Azkhaban couldn't be topped. But give Mike Newell credit: Harry's foray into Voldemortish gloom and teenage angst was easily the most compelling Potter film so far. Extra points to Gryffindor for Brendan Gleeson's more-than-slightly-bent Mad-Eye Moody, and to Slytherin for Ralph Fiennes' serpentine cameo as He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.
7. King Kong: I had this film as high as #2 for awhile, and there are visual marvels therein that no other movie this year came close to offering, most notably Kong loose in Depression-Era New York City. But, there's no way around it -- even given all the B-movie thrills and great-ape-empathizing that PJ offers in the last 120 minutes, the first hour is close to terrible, which has to knock the gorilla down a few notches.
8. Capote: When it comes to amorality for artistry's sake, Jack Black's Carl Denham ain't got nothing on Philip Seymour Hoffman's Truman Capote. I think it'd be awhile before I want to watch this movie again, but, still, it was a dark, memorable trip into bleeding Kansas and the writerly id.
9. Sin City: One of the most faithful comic-to-film adaptations on celluloid also made for one of the more engaging and visually arresting cinematic trips this year. I don't know if the look and feel of Sin City can sustain a bona fide franchise, but this first outing was a surprisingly worthwhile film experience (with particular kudos for Mickey Rourke's Marv.)
10. Munich: I wrote about this one at length very recently, so I'll defer to the original review.
11. Brokeback Mountain: A beautifully shot and beautifully told love story, although admittedly Ang Lee's staid Brokeback at times feels like transparent Oscar bait.
12. Lord of War: Anchored by Nicholas Cage's wry voiceover, Andrew Niccol's sardonic expose of the arms trade was the funniest of this year's global message films (That is, if you like 'em served up cold.)
13. The Squid and the Whale: Speaking of which, The Squid and the Whale made ugly, embittered divorce about as funny as ever it's likely to get, thanks to Jeff Daniels' turn as the pretentious, haunted Bernard Berkman.
14. Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith: Thank the Force for small kindnesses: George Lucas put the Star Wars universe to bed with far and away his best outing of the prequels. The film flirts dangerously with the Dark Side, particularly in the "let's take a meeting" second act, but for the most part Sith felt -- finally -- like a return to that galaxy long ago and far, far away.
15. A History of Violence: I think David Cronenberg's most recent take on vigilantism and misplaced identity was slightly overrated by most critics -- When you get down to it, the film was pretty straightforward in its doling out of violent fates to those who most deserved them. Still, solid performances and Cronenberg's mordant humor still made for a far-better-than-average night at the movies.
16. Walk the Line: Despite the great performances by Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon, Walk the Line ultimately seemed too much of a by-the-numbers biopic to do the Man in Black full credit. But, definitely worth seeing.
17. In Good Company (2004): Paul Weitz's sweet folktale of synergy, downsizing, and corporate obsolescence was too charitable and good-natured to think ill of any of its characters, and I usually prefer more mordant fare. Nevertheless, the intelligently-written IGC turned out to be a quality piece of breezy pop filmmaking.
18. The Constant Gardener: Another very good film that I still thought was slightly overrated by the critics, Fernando Meirelles' sophomore outing skillfully masked its somewhat iffy script with lush cinematography and choice Soderberghian editing.
19. Primer (2004): A completely inscrutable sci-fi tone poem on the perils of time travel. Kevin and I saw it twice and still have very little clue as to what's going most of the time -- but I (we?) mean that in the best way possible.
20. The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe: The Chronic-what? Andrew Adamson's retelling of C.S. Lewis's most popular tome lagged in places, and the two older kids were outfitted with unwieldy character arcs that often stopped the film dead, but it still felt surprisingly faithful to the spirit of Narnia, Christianized lion and all.
Most Disappointing: The Fantastic Four, which I finally saw on the plane yesterday -- One of Marvel's A-List properties is given the straight-to-video treatment. From the Mr. Fantastic bathroom humor to the complete evisceration of Dr. Doom, this movie turned out just as uninspired and embarrassing as the trailers suggested. Runner-Up: The Brothers Grimm. Terry Gilliam's long-awaited return wasn't exactly a return-to-form. But, hey, at least he got a movie made, and Tideland is just around the corner.
Most Variable: Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: I still haven't figured out how I feel about this one. I liked it quite a bit upon first viewing, but it didn't hold up at all the second time around. Still, the casting feels right, and I'd be up for The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, provided they turn up the Ford-and-Zaphod shenanigans and turn down the forced Arthur-and-Trillian romance.
Worth a Rental: Constantine, Aliens of the Deep, Me and You and Everyone We Know, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, The Island, March of the Penguins, The Aristocrats,Tim Burton's Corpse Bride, Jarhead, Sarah Silverman: Jesus is Magic, The Ice Harvest, War of the Worlds
Ho-Hum: Inside Deep Throat, The Jacket, Million Dollar Baby (2004), The Ring 2, Kingdom of Heaven, Unleashed, Mr. & Mrs. Smith,
Aeon Flux
Best Actor: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Capote; Eric Bana, Munich; Heath Ledger, Brokeback Mountain; David Straitharn, Good Night, and Good Luck
Best Actress: Reese Witherspoon, Walk the Line; Naomi Watts, King Kong
Best Supporting Actor: Jeff Daniels, The Squid and the Whale; George Clooney, Syriana; Brendan Gleeson, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Best Supporting Actress: Maria Bello, A History of Violence; Tilda Swinton, The Chronicles of Narnia
Unseen: The 40-Year-Old Virgin, Bee Season, Broken Flowers, Cache, Casanova, Cinderella Man, Crash, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, Grizzly Man, Gunner Palace, Head On, Hustle & Flow, Junebug, Match Point, The New World, Nine Lives, Pride and Prejudice, Serenity (although I watched all of Firefly last week), Shopgirl, The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, Wallace and Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit, Wedding Crashers
2006: Frankly, the line-up doesn't look too exciting at the moment. Nevertheless, 2006 will bring A Scanner Darkly, Casino Royale, The Da Vinci Code, Flags of our Fathers, The Good German, The Inside Man, Marie Antoinette, M:I III, Pirates of the Caribbean 2, Snakes on a Plane (!!), Southland Tales, Superman Returns, Tristam Shandy, V for Vendetta, and X3.
The 2005 Golden Globe nominees are announced, with Brokeback Mountain (7 nods) and Good Night, and Good Luck (4 nods) the big winners and Syriana (2: Clooney for Supporting Actor & Best Score), King Kong (2: PJ for Best Director & Best Score), and Munich (2: Spielberg for Director and Best Screenplay) for the most part overlooked. (Despite what the official website says, All the King's Men has been kicked to 2006.) Brokeback seems to have the early lead, but I'd say the field is pretty open in most categories (although Philip Seymour Hoffman as Best Actor for Capote seems likely.)
"He's an old -- someone described him and I think it's a quite cool way of looking at him -- he's an old, psychotic hobo. He really is. He's not used to -- although it's in gorillas' innate desire to connect with other beings -- he's just not used to it. The only contact he has are with creatures that are trying to attack him or threaten." Dark Horizons runs a fascinating -- and spoilerish -- interview with Andy Serkis on King Kong, motion-capture, and acting tips from Rwandan primates.
Big doings for a Monday morning: Through a fortuitous series of events and two hours of toe-freezing waiting outside, I just got back from a critic's showing of Peter Jackson's King Kong over at the Loews on 68th St. (As an aside, the screening was run terribly-- From the color-coded seating to the random security lines, everything was organized just enough to unnecessarily complicate everything and to reward bad behavior.) But let's get down to brass tacks here: How much for the ape? Well, in essence PJ's King Kong is the Mother of All B-Films -- the Skull Island action sequences are spectacular, Kong's adventures in New York seem appropriately mythic, the special effects throughout (particularly the Great Ape himself) are mind-blowing...Without a doubt, Kong is one of the best movies I've seen this year. That being said, I'd be lying if I didn't admit that the film has some serious pacing problems, particularly in the first hour, and at times I thought it seemed almost too reverent of its source material. At the very least, Kong, while definitely a Wonder of the World and no mistake, could have benefited from some minor grooming.
Fortunately, many of the most glaring missteps in Kong occur relatively early on. The film begins very auspiciously with a choice montage of Depression-Era New York, during which we're introduced to beautiful young vaudevillian Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) and, soon thereafter, director-on-the-make Carl Denham (Jack Black) and his long-suffering assistant (Colin Hanks). From here throughout, both Watts and Black are excellent -- One would never think Watts was interacting with anything less than a grotesquely large primate in the scenes to come, and Black is surprisingly good and unobtrusive as Denham, even if there are a few too many shots of him...slowly...turning...to look at...something huge, amazing, and/or ghastly.
That being said, after the opening, the film slows to a crawl for a good 30-40 minutes, as Denham, Darrow, & co. wend their way to Skull Island about the S.S. Venture. Frankly, I was reminded a lot of the first hour of The Matrix Reloaded during this sequence -- There's nothing as flat-out embarrassing as the Bacardi Silver rave here, but there is a lot of hamfisted expository dialogue masking as character development. Particularly egregious in this regard is everything involving the ship's First Mate (Evan Parke) and a young stowaway (Jamie Bell) he's taken under his wing. Frankly, this whole subplot is a mistake -- It's laden with stilted groaners (the digression on Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, for example) and comes off as cliche-ridden as the tough general and his fresh-faced recruit in that other Matrix film.
Fortunately, right around the time the Venture loses steam, the film starts picking some up. The run-in with the natives is rather creepy in PJ fashion, although, once again, it could use some tightening -- We only need one slo-mo Bad Taste-ish zoom to a human skull and one frightening Zombified Skull Islander in the throes of an epileptic seizure...but PJ gives us four or five of each. Still, when Kong first rumbles out of the jungle to acquire his new sacrificial plaything, the film starts to gather the hurtling momentum that'll characterize most of the rest of its run.
And, indeed, the rollicking next hour of the film is, for the most part, Jurassic Park on 'roids. Throughout the Skull Island tour (which includes many death-defying stops and Shelob-esque reveals), Peter Jackson and the WETA gang really let their freak flag fly, and the fun here is infectious. This is a monster movie maven at the top of his game, and some of the sequences here -- most notably Kong vs three T-Rexes -- are jaw-droppingly (or jaw-rippingly, as the case may be) spectacular. I don't want to give away some of the twists and turns in this middle chapter...but, if you're not really enjoying the heck out of this hour of the film (even despite some of the less-plausible deux-ex-machinas involved), I'm not sure why you went to see Kong in the first place.
Of course, the story returns to New York in the final hour, when Denham brings his newly-acquired Eighth Wonder of the World to the Great White Way. (Look for the now somewhat-unfortunate cameo by Howard Shore, doing what he might well have done best...To be honest, the James Newton Howard score sounded mostly like incidental music. If there was a "Kong theme," I didn't catch it on first viewing.) And, at this point, the film forsakes the mayhem of its middle hour to bask in the Gothic-in-Gotham resonance of the Kong mythos. There are some really beautiful moments here in the final act, although I do have some quibbles: The timing of night and day makes very little sense, and streets seem to clear of fear-stricken bystanders at the most opportune times for Kong and his ladyfriend. (Then again, we are talking about a 25-foot ape here, so perhaps I should just shut up and suspend the disbelief.) Also, there's a scene in Central Park here that I expect will divide audiences -- particularly fanboy audiences -- down the middle. I found it somewhat touching, but I also couldn't help imagining Kong & Ann visiting Coney Island and/or partaking of a Gray's Papaya while they're at it. "Something tells me I'm into something good..."
And, then, of course, we end atop the Empire State. At this point, you're either with the movie or you're not, and I was definitely moved by Kong's last act. That being said, I can also see the argument that some folks made of Return of the King being made here...the last few scenes are exquisite and heartfelt, but they're also just ever-so-slightly redundant. You can forgive PJ being a trifle indulgent here, I think -- this is the big payoff, not only the culmination of a three-hour viewing experience but the most memorable moment in his favorite movie of all time. That being said, I have to admit that at a certain point, as the biplanes went around for yet another pass and Kong looked increasingly miserable, that the horrible cynic in me noted this was somewhat akin to watching a remake of Citizen Kane with a fifteen-minute sled scene.
I was also somewhat reminded of Old Yeller in the closing moments, which -- it must be said -- speaks for how amazing PJ, WETA, and Andy Serkis' King Kong turned out to be. In fact, this even far outshines their amazing work on Gollum -- At no point did I find myself questioning the reality of this Kong, even in the midst of some severe Tyrannosaurus Rex bashing. The Dian Fossey gloss on the relationship between Darrow & Kong helped too -- In perhaps the cleverest update of the old Kong, Darrow utilizes a very unique set of skills to bond with the Great Ape. And it's those scenes -- and their other quiet moments together -- that are the most memorable aspects of this Kong, which is no small feat given the action flourishes of the second act.
In sum, King Kong is an amazing film, and easily one of the best movies of this year. But, to be fair, it's also undeniably too indulgent at times, and I think it ultimately fails to achieve the transcendent heights of the Rings trilogy. (But I'll freely admit to having more of an emotional investment in Tolkien than I do in the original Kong.) At the very least, it's definitely worth seeing, not only as a world-class monster movie but also as a worthy retelling of one of the cinema's greatest stories.
"'A few people have already asked me why we're taking twice as long to tell essentially the same story,' says the director. 'And I don't really know. We've been asking that ourselves. I'm going to have to come up with a better answer.'" Newsweek's Devin Gordon sizes up PJ's King Kong, and he seems to really like it: Jackson "proved once again that he might be the only guy whose films are worth getting on a plane and flying halfway around the planet to see."
Dark Horizons procures a number of very fetching King Kong stills...some might be considered minor spoilers, if for some reason you don't already know the basic outlines of the tale.
"And the beast looked upon the face of beauty, and it stayed its hand from killing, and from that day it was as one dead." KongisKing has the long-awaited new trailer for King Kong, albeit a lousy version. It looks good, but unless you're a major fan, I might content myself with the behind the scenes sampler for a few hours until a nice large Quicktime version is released. Update: Now, that's more like it...large and in charge.
The World of Fellowship of the Ringcraft, a.k.a. Tolkien meets Worlds of Warcraft. I haven't played WoW or any other MMORPG myself, but this is still pretty funny if you've done any sort of online gaming. (Via Triptych Cryptic.)
Step right up...In the footsteps of the US one-sheet, a "behind-the-scenes" trailer for King Kong is up with lots of new and splendid footage, including Kong atop the Empire State. I wasn't much for the teaser, but this looks grand.
"Ms. Snider said she did not think the three-hour length would be an obstacle for moviegoers. Three-hour epics, she said, are Mr. Jackson's 'brand.'" The NYT checks in on PJ's Eighth Wonder of the World, and unveils the running time: 3 hours.
